UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ¨☒                             Filed by a Partyparty other than the Registrant  ¨☐

Check the appropriate box:

HFF, Inc.INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

HFF, INC.

ONE OXFORD CENTREVICTORY PARK

301 GRANT STREET,2323 VICTORY AVENUE, SUITE 11001200

PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15219DALLAS, TEXAS 75219

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Purpose:

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy promptly in the accompanying reply envelope.

You are entitled to vote if you were a stockholder at the close of business on April 17, 2015.2018.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Admittance to the meeting will be limited to stockholders eligible to vote or their authorized representative(s). Beneficial owners holding shares through an intermediary such as a bank or broker will be admitted only upon proof of ownership.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 28, 2015:24, 2018: The Proxy Statement and Proxy Card relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Annual Report to Stockholders are available athttp://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=205281&p=proxy.proxy.

HFF, INC.

ONE OXFORD CENTREVICTORY PARK

301 GRANT STREET,2323 VICTORY AVENUE, SUITE 11001200

PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15219DALLAS, TEXAS 75219

PROXY STATEMENT

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are being mailed, beginning on or about May 5, 2015,April 30, 2018, to owners of shares of HFF, Inc. (“we,” “us” or the “Company”) Class A common stock in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). This proxy procedure is necessary to permit all common stockholders, many of whom live throughout the United States and in foreign countries and are unable to attend the Annual Meeting, to vote. The Board of Directors encourages you to read this document thoroughly and to take this opportunity to vote on the matters to be decided at the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held on May 28, 2015,24, 2018, at 8:00 a.m., CentralEastern Daylight Savings Time, at Ritz Carlton, 2121 McKinney Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75201.One International Place, 100 Oliver Street, 40^th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02110-2605. For directions to our Annual Meeting in order to vote in person, you may call our Investor Relations department at (713)852-3500. Our principal executive offices are located at One Oxford Centre, 301 Grant Street,Victory Park, 2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 1100, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219.1200, Dallas, Texas 75219. Our telephone number is (412) 281-8714.(214)265-0880.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING THE REGISTRANT

In connection with our initial public offering, we effected a reorganization of our business into a holding company holding the partnership interests in Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, L.P. and HFF Securities L.P. (together, the “Operating Partnerships”), held through the wholly owned subsidiary HFF Partnership Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and all of the outstanding shares of Holliday GP Corp. (“Holliday GP”), the sole general partner of each of the Operating Partnerships. The transactions that occurred in connection with the initial public offering and reorganization are referred to as the “Reorganization Transactions.”

Unless the context otherwise requires, references to (1) “HFF Holdings” refer solely to HFF Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that was previously the holding company for our consolidated subsidiaries, and not to any of its subsidiaries, (2) “HFF LP” refer to Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, (3) “HFF Securities” refer to HFF Securities L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and registered broker-dealer, (4) “Holliday GP” refer to Holliday GP Corp., a Delaware corporation and the general partner of HFF LP and HFF Securities, (5) “HoldCo LLC” refer to HFF Partnership Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of HFF, Inc. and, (6) “Holdings Sub” refer to HFF LP Acquisition LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of HFF Holdings. Our business operations are conducted byHoldings, (7) “HFF Real Estate” refer to HFF LPReal Estate Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales and (8) “HFF Securities Limited” refer to HFF Securities which are sometimes referred toLimited, a company incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K asEngland and Wales and registered with the “Operating Partnerships.” Also, exceptFinancial Conduct Authority (collectively, with HFF Real Estate, the “UK Subsidiaries” and, with HFF Securities, the “Securities Subsidiaries”). Except where specifically noted, references in this Proxy Statement to “the Company,” “we”“we,” “our,” or “us” mean HFF, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions.

Our internet website iswww.hfflp.com. The information on our internet website is not incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement and is not part of the proxy soliciting materials.

VOTING PROCEDURES

Your vote is very important.    important.    Your shares can only be voted at the Annual Meeting if you are present or represented by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you are encouraged to vote by proxy to assure that your shares will be represented. Stockholders may vote by means of completing a proxy card and mailing it in the postage-paid envelope provided. Please refer to your proxy card or the information forwarded by your bank, broker or other holder of record.

You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by (a) giving written notice to the Secretary of the Company, (b) submitting a proxy bearing a later date or (c) casting a ballot at the Annual Meeting. Properly executed proxies that are received before the Annual Meeting’s adjournment will be voted in accordance with the directions provided. If no directions are given, your shares will be voted by one of the individuals named on your proxy card as recommended by the Board of Directors.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

In accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law and the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws, the Company’s business, property and affairs are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors. Although directors are not involved in theday-to-day operating details, they are kept informed of the Company’s business through written reports and documents provided to them regularly, as well as by operating, financial and other reports presented by the officers of the Company at meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of the Board of Directors.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(ITEM 1 ON PROXY CARD)

The Company’s directors are divided into three classes. The members of each class serve for a staggered, three-year term. Upon the expiration of the term of a class of directors, directors in that class will be elected for three-year terms at the annual meeting of stockholders in the year in which their term expires. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist ofone-third of our directors. The Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws allow the Board of Directors to set the number of directors on the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors currently consists of eight directors. Under Delaware law and the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, the Company may increase the number of directors during the year and appoint additional directors to fill vacancies so created if it chooses to do so.

The term of office of one class of directors expires each year in rotation so that one class is elected at each annual meeting of stockholders for a three-year term. The term of the Class III directors will expire at the Annual Meeting. The other directors will remain in office for the remainder of their respective terms, as indicated below.

Director candidates are nominated by the Board of Directors upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has recommended the three nominees below, each of whom is currently a Class III director of the Company. Stockholders are also entitled to nominate director candidates for the Board of Directors in accordance with the procedures set forth on page 1011 under the heading “Corporate Governance — Submission of Director Nominations” in this Proxy Statement.

Director elections are determined by a plurality of votes cast. The persons named on the accompanying form of proxy will vote the shares “FOR” the nominees, unless you instruct otherwise. Each nominee has consented to stand for election and the Board of Directors does not anticipate that any nominee will be unavailable to serve. In the event that one or more of the nominees should become unavailable to serve at the time of the Annual Meeting, the shares represented by proxy will be voted for the remaining nominees and any substitute nominee(s) designated by the Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors believes that each of the directors and nominees for director listed below has the sound character, integrity, judgment and record of achievement necessary to be a member of the Board of Directors. In addition, each of the directors and nominees for director has exhibited during his or her prior service as a director the ability to operate cohesively with the other members of the Board of Directors and to challenge and question management in a constructive way. Moreover, the Board of Directors believes that each director and nominee for director brings a strong and unique background and skill set to the Board of Directors, giving the Board of Directors as a whole competence and experience in diverse areas, including corporate governance and board service, finance, management and commercial real estate industry experience.

Set forth below is information regarding each nominee for Class III director, as well as each Class I and Class II director (each of whose term will continue after the Annual Meeting), including their ages, years of service as directors, business experience and service on other boards of directors during at least the last five years, as well as certain specific experiences, qualifications and skills that led to the Board of Directors’ conclusion that each of the directors and nominees for director listed below should continue to serve as a director.

NOMINEES FOR CLASS III DIRECTORS

Susan P. McGalla.  McGalla.  Ms. McGalla became a director of HFF, Inc. in October 2009. Ms. McGalla is currentlywas most recently the DirectorVice President of Strategic PlanningBusiness Strategy and GrowthCreative Development for the Pittsburgh Steelers Football Club. Prior to assuming that role, she founded P3 Executive Consulting, LLC. P3 offersoffered comprehensive consulting services to clients within and outside of the specialty retail industry. The services are inclusive ofServices included branding, marketing, product merchandising and omni-channel execution to strategy, talent management and operational P&L efficiencies. From January 2011, to July 2012, Ms. McGalla was chief executive officer of The Wet Seal, Inc. Ms. McGalla was brought in to that position to reinvent and grow two brands, Wet Seal and Arden B. From 2009 to 2011, Ms. McGalla worked as a consultant within the specialty retail landscape. Prior to thather consulting role, Ms. McGalla was the President and Chief Merchandising Officer at American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (“AEO”) from March 2003 to January 2009. In that role, she had a $3 billion responsibility for the performance, business development and all creative aspects of the AE Brand, aerie, MarinMartin and Osa, and 77kids. With over 14 years total in various leadership roles within AEO, Ms. McGalla contributed to industry revenue and profit growth, growing revenues from $340 million to over $3 billion. She was responsible for portfolio expansion from one brand to four brands, and in 2008, revenues of $3 billion, net income of $400 million with over 1,000 stores and 28,000 employees. Prior to AEO, Ms. McGalla held merchandising management positions at Joseph Horne Company from June 1986 to June 1994. Ms. McGalla presently serves on the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of the Magee Research Institute, the council for the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, the advisory board of The Energy Network and was formerly on the executive committee and board of directors for the Allegheny Conference on Community Development. Ms. McGalla earned her B.A. from Mount Union College. Ms. McGalla’s executive positions provide her with both leadership skills and comprehensive experience in accounting, finance and corporate governance matters, which she utilizes both in her roles as a director and ona member of the Company’s Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Age: 5053

Lenore M. Sullivan.  Ms. Sullivan became a director on the Board of Directors of HFF, Inc. in January 2007. Ms. Sullivan presently serves on the board of directors of PotlatchDeltic Corp., RREEF America REIT II and RREEF Core Plus Industrial Fund. From June 2015 through February 2018, Ms. Sullivan served on the board of directors of Deltic Timber Corporation, a predecessor of PotlatchDeltic Corp. From 2007 to 2009, Ms. Sullivan was a partner with Perella Weinberg Partners, serving as portfolio manager for the firm’s Agility Real Return Assets Fund. Ms. Sullivan served as the associate director for the Real Estate and Finance and Investment Center at the University of Texas at Austin from 2002 through 2007. From 2000 to 2002, she was vice president of Hunt Private Equity Group, Inc., and from 1992 to 2000 she was the president andco-owner of Stonegate Advisors, an investment banking firm. Ms. Sullivan previously served as a member ofon the board of directors of Parkway Properties, Inc., where she sat on the compensation committee and chaired the governance and nominating committee. Ms. Sullivan currently chairspresently serves as a member of the Investment Advisory Committee to the board of trustees of the Employee Retirement System of Texas. She also sits on the investment committee to the board of trustees of the Austin Community Foundation. She is a member of the Architecture School advisory board and the Leadership Committee of the Real Estate Finance and Investment Center at the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin, and a charter investor in the Texas Women Ventures Fund, and a partner in Republic Holdings Texas I and II, L.P.Fund. Ms. Sullivan has also served as a member of the advisory board of directors of Capstone Partners and as a full member of the Urban Land Institute and the Pension Real Estate Association. Ms. Sullivan graduated cum laude from Smith College with a degree in economics and government and a minor in urban studies. She holds a M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Ms. Sullivan holds a Masters Professional Director Certification from the American College of Corporate Directors, a national public company director education and credentialing organization. Ms. Sullivan brings to the Board of Directors extensive knowledge of real estate financing and related capital markets. In addition, her experience on the board of directors of a public company provides her with valuable corporate governance and leadership insights used in her role on the Company’s Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Age: 5760

Morgan K. O’Brien.  Mr. O’Brien became a director of HFF, Inc. in October 2012. Mr. O’Brien has been the president and chief executive officer of Peoples Natural Gas, Inc., a natural gas company, since 2010. He is also currently a director of Matthews International Corporation, a publicly-held designer, manufacturer and marketer of memorialization products and brand solutions, the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Boy Scouts of

Greater Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh Cultural Trust, Pittsburgh Opera and American Gas Association. Mr. O’Brien is also chairman of the United Way of Allegheny County.County, Pittsburgh Cultural Trust and American Gas Association. Between 2001 and 2010, Mr. O’Brien was president and chief executive officer of Duquesne Light Company, an electric energy provider. Prior to this position, he was chief operating officer, chief financial officer, vice president and controller of Duquesne Light

Company from 1991 to 2001. Mr. O’Brien received a B.S. in Accounting and M.S. in Taxation from Robert Morris University. The Board expects to draw on Mr. O’Brien’s financial knowledge as he serves onas a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees. Age: 5558

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” each of the nominees listed above.

INCUMBENT CLASS I DIRECTORS — TO CONTINUE IN OFFICE FOR

TERMS EXPIRING IN 20162019

Deborah H. McAneny.  McAneny.  Ms. McAneny became a director of HFF, Inc. in January 2007. Ms. McAneny previously served as the chief operating officer of Benchmark Assisted Living, LLC from 2007 to 2009. Prior to this, Ms. McAneny was employed at John Hancock Financial Services for 20 years, including as executive vice president for Structured and Alternative Investments and a member of its policy committee from 2002 to 2004, as senior vice president for John Hancock’s Real Estate Investment Group from 2000 to 2002 and as a vice president of the Real Estate Investment Group from 1997 to 2000. Ms. McAneny is currentlypresently serves as a member of the board of directors of RREEF Property Trust, Inc;Inc.; board of directors of RREEF America REIT II,II; board of directors of THL Credit, Inc.; board of directors of KKR Real Estate Finance Trust, Inc.; board of advisors of Benchmark Senior Living, LLC; and board of trusteesdirectors of the University of Vermont; and board of trustees of The Rivers School,Vermont Foundation, and was formerly a member of the board of directors of KKR Financial Holdings, LLC, trustee of the University of Vermont and president of the Commercial Mortgage Securities Association. She received a B.S. from the University of Vermont. Ms. McAneny holds a Masters Professional Director Certification from the American College of Corporate Directors, a national public company director education and credentialing organization. Ms. McAneny brings to the Board of Directors valuable experience in the real estate investment sector. In addition, the Board expects to utilize Ms. McAneny’s governance experience through her service as lead independent director, Chairman of the Nominating and draws on Ms. McAneny’s financial knowledge through her service onCorporate Governance Committee and as a member of the AuditCompensation Committee. Age: 5659

Steven E. Wheeler.Wheeler.  Mr. Wheeler became a director of HFF, Inc. in March 2010. He has been the president of Wheeler & Co., LLC, a private investment firm, since 1997. He is currently a director of Anika Therapeutics, Inc., a publicly held medical device company; andcompany. During the past five years, Mr. Wheeler also served as a member of the board of directors of Bariston Partners, LLC, a private equity investment firm.firm and PingTone Communications, Inc., a privately head VOIP telephone services provider. Between 1997 and 2011, he was a principal of Hall Properties, Inc., a real estate investment and consulting firm. Between 1993 and February 1996, he was managing director and a director of Copley Real Estate Advisors and president, chief executive officer and a director of Copley Properties, Inc., a publicly traded real estate investment trust. He was the chairman and chief executive officer of Hancock Realty Investors, which managed an equity real estate portfolio, from 1991 to February 1993. Prior to this position, he was an executive vice president of Bank of New England Corporation from 1990 to 1991. Mr. Wheeler received a B.S. in Engineering Science from the University of Virginia, an M.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Michigan and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School. Through his past and present experience on the boards of directors of various other companies, both public and private, Mr. Wheeler has developed strong leadership skills and valuable experience in corporate governance, which he utilizes in his roles on the Company’s CompensationAudit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. In addition, his prior experience in executive positions at real estate investment companies gives him insight into the issues faced by the Company and the markets in which it operates. Age: 6871

INCUMBENT CLASS II DIRECTORS — TO CONTINUE IN OFFICE FOR

TERMS EXPIRING IN 20172020

Mark D. Gibson.Gibson.  Mr. Gibson became a director and Vice Chairman of HFF, Inc. in November 2006 and effective April 1, 2014, he became the Chief Executive Officer of HFF, Inc. Mr. Gibson is one of our founding partners having joined our predecessor firm, Holliday Fenoglio & Company, in 1984. Since 2003, Mr. Gibson has held the positionpositions of executive managing director of HFF LP since 2003, served as aand member of either HFF LP’s executive and/orthe operating committee when each was the governing committee, from 2003 to 2010 and also served as co-head of the Company’s Dallas office during that time period.HFF Holdings. Additionally, Mr. Gibson has served as a member of the HFF LP’sLP executive committee since 2010. From 1993 to 2010, and he has also been a memberMr. Gibson served asco-head of the operating committee of HFF Holdings since 2003.Company’s Dallas office. Mr. Gibson is a trustee for the Urban Land Institute (ULI), a member of ULI’s Executive Committee and a member of ULI’s IOPC Gold Council; member and former program chair of the Association of Foreign Investors in Real Estate (AFIRE); member and former chairman of the University of Texas Real Estate Finance and Investment Center;Center and member of its Executive Committee; member of the board of visitors at UT Southwestern University Hospitals and Clinics;Clinics and member of UTSW Foundation; member of the McCombs School of Business Advisory Council at The University of Texas at Austin; advisory board member of Baylor Health Care System Foundation; trustee and member of the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC); and a member of World Presidents’ Organization and World Affairs Council.Organization. Mr. Gibson graduated in 1981 from the University of Texas at Austin with a B.B.A. in Finance. Mr. Gibson’s history with the Company allows him to bring to the board of directors a deep knowledge of the Company’s and the Operating Partnerships’ development and operations. In addition, Mr. Gibson’s experience with various real estate industry professional associations and role within the Operating Partnerships provides the board with valuable insight into the issues and market developments facing the real estate industry as a whole. Age: 5659

George L. Miles, Jr.  Mr. Miles became a director of HFF, Inc. in January 2007. Mr. Miles is the former Chairman Emeritus of the Chester Group, a leading water/waste water, facility design build, scientific research and management company. Mr. Miles served as president and chief executive officer of WQED Multimedia, the public broadcaster in southwestern Pennsylvania, until his retirement in 2010. He joined WQED in 1994 after serving ten years as executive vice president and chief operating officer of WNET/Thirteen in New York. Prior to that, he held executive positions at KDKA, Pittsburgh; WPCQ, Charlotte; the Westinghouse Television Group; andWBZ-TV, Boston. Earlier in Mr. Miles’ career he was a contract auditor at the U.S. Department of Defense and a manager at Touche Ross & Co. He servesMr. Miles has served as a member on the board of directors of American International Group, Inc. (AIG) (retired 2017); EQT Corporation; Harley Davidson, Inc. (retired 2017); Chester Group; the University of Pittsburgh (Trustee Emeritus); Mt. Ararat Community Center and Ringling College of Art & Design. He is the former Chairman of the Association for America’s Public Television Stations and the Urban League of Pittsburgh, Inc. He earned his B.A. degree from Seton Hall University and his M.B.A. from Fairleigh Dickinson University. Through Mr. Miles’ extensive executive and directorship experience, he brings to the Board of Directors strong financial and leadership expertise, which he implements, in part, in his roles as Chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee. Age: 7376

Joe B. Thornton, Jr.Jr.  Mr. Thornton became a director and a Vice Chairman of HFF, Inc. in November 2006 and effective April 1, 2014, he assumed the role of President of HFF, Inc. and Managing Member of HFF LP and HFF Securities, the Operating Partnerships. He is also currently an executive managing director of HFF LP. Mr. Thornton has served as a member of either HFF LP’s executive and/or operating committee, when each was the governing committee, from 2003 to the present. Mr. Thornton also served asco-head of the Company’s Dallas office from 2003 to 2010. He has been a member of the operating committee of HFF Holdings since 2003. Mr. Thornton joined HFF LP’s predecessor firm, Holliday Fenoglio, Inc., in March 1992. He has held several senior positions with the firm, including board member and principal. Prior to his employment with us, he was a senior vice president of The Joyner Mortgage Company, Inc., where he was responsible for the origination of commercial mortgage and equity transactions, and a senior accountant with the Audit Division of Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co. Mr. Thornton is a licensed Real Estate Salesman in the State of Texas. Mr. Thornton serves as a member of the Commercial Real Estate/Multifamily Finance Board of Governors and is an Executive Council Member and member of the Leadership Committee of UT Real Estate Finance & Investment Center. Mr. Thornton graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a B.B.A. in Accounting in 1982. Mr. Thornton brings to the Board of Directors his extensive experience with the Company, which gives him an

in-depth knowledge of the Company, its history and its businesses. Mr. Thornton’s role within the Operating Partnerships also provides the Board of Directors with a broad awareness of the commercial real estate markets. Age: 5457

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE

THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

(ITEM 2 ON PROXY CARD)

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Company is providing its stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion beginning on page 2123 of this Proxy Statement.

In connection with setting the compensation for namedMark D. Gibson, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Gregory Conley, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), Joe B. Thornton, Jr., President, Matthew D. Lawton, Executive Managing Director and Michael J. Tepedino, Executive Managing Director (collectively with the CEO and CFO, the “named executive officers,officers” or “NEOs”), the Company has adopted the philosophy set forth in the Mission and Vision Statement of the Operating Partnerships. The Mission and Vision Statement reflects our pay for value-added performance philosophy. The Compensation Committee’s goals in structuring the Company’s compensation program for its named executive officersNEOs are to:

The Compensation Committee has determined that to achieve these objectives, the Company’s executive compensation program should reward both individual and Company short-term and long-term performance. To this end, the Committee believes that executive compensation packages provided by the Company to its named executive officersNEOs should include both cash- and stock-based compensation. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Philosophy — Mission and Vision Statement” for further details on the Company’s compensation philosophy.

For a more detailed description of the Company’s financial results for fiscal year 2014,2017, please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.2017. The Company believes that its executive compensation program has played an essential role in its continuing financial success by aligning the long-term interests of its named executive officersNEOs with the long-term interests of its stockholders.

The Company is asking our stockholders to cast an advisory vote to approve our named executive officerNEO compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’NEOs’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officersNEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, the Board of Directors encourages the Company’s stockholders to approve the following advisory resolution to approve our named executive compensation:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers,NEOs, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion included in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is hereby approved on an advisory basis.”

As an advisory vote, this vote is not binding upon the Company. However, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering the Company’s executive compensation program, values the opinions expressed by stockholders in their vote on this item and therefore will take such vote into consideration when evaluating the Company’s compensation programs and practices applicable to the named executive officers.NEOs. The Company holds this vote annually and the next vote will be held at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2016.2019.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of thenon-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.NEOs.

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT, REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

(ITEM 3 ON PROXY CARD)

The Board of Directors, acting upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, asks that the stockholders ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent, registered certified public accountants to audit and report upon the financial statements of the Company for the 20152018 fiscal year. Ratification requires the affirmative vote of a majority of eligible shares present at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and voting thereon. Unless otherwise specified by the stockholders, the shares of stock represented by the proxy will be votedFORratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent, registered certified public accountants.

Although the submission to stockholders of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP is not required by law or the Company’s amended and restated bylaws, the Audit Committee believes it is appropriate to submit this matter to stockholders to allow a forum for stockholders to express their views with regard to the Audit Committee’s selection. In the event the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Board of Directors will reconsider its selection. Even if the selection is ratified, the Board of Directors, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent accounting firm at any time during the year if the Board of Directors determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

One or more representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Company’s independent, registered certified public accountants for the 20152018 fiscal year.

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

The next stockholder meeting will be held on or about May 28, 2016.23, 2019. Stockholders wishing to have a proposal included in the Board of Directors’ 20162019 Proxy Statement must submit the proposal so that the Secretary of the Company receives it no later than December 31, 2015,26, 2018, which is 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date this Proxy Statement was released to stockholders. The notice must describe various matters regarding the nominee or proposed business. The Securities and Exchange Commission rules set forth standards as to what stockholder proposals are required to be included in a proxy statement. In addition, pursuant to the Company’s amended and restated bylaws, if the stockholder (or a qualified representative of the stockholder) does not appear at the meeting at which the voting takes place with respect to such stockholder’s proposal, such proposal shall be disregarded, notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by the Company.

For any proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement (as described above) but is instead sought to be presented directly at next year’s annual meeting, Securities and Exchange Commission rules permit management to vote proxies in its discretion if (a) the Company receives notice of the proposal before the close of business 45 days before the first anniversary of the mailing date of this Proxy Statement and advises stockholders in next year’s proxy statement about the nature of the matter and how management intends to vote on such matter, or (b) the Company does not receive notice of the proposal prior to the close of business 45 days before the first anniversary of the mailing date of this Proxy Statement. Notices of intention to present proposals at the 20162019 Annual Meeting should be addressed to the Chief Operating Officer and Secretary of HFF, Inc., One Oxford Centre, 301 Grant Street,Victory Park, 2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 1100, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219.1200, Dallas Texas 75219. For further information regarding the submission of director nominations, see “Corporate Governance — Submission of Director Nominations” in this Proxy Statement.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

The Audit Committee appoints the independent accounting firm to be retained to audit the Company’s financial statements, and once retained, the independent accounting firm reports directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee consults with and reviews recommendations made by the accounting firm with respect to financial statements, financial records and financial controls of the Company and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors as it deems appropriate from time to time. The Audit Committee is responsible forpre-approving both audit andnon-audit engagements with the independent accountants. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter setting forth the functions the Audit Committee is to perform, and this report is made pursuant to that charter.

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors of HFF, Inc. Management is responsible for the Company’s financial reporting process, including its system of internal controls, and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s independent accountants are responsible for auditing those financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and review these processes. It is not the Audit Committee’s duty or responsibility to conduct auditing or accounting reviews.

The Audit Committee and the Chairman of the Audit Committee have met with management during fiscal year 20142017 to consider the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls, and discussed these matters and the overall scope and plans for the audit of the Company with the Company’s independent, registered certified public accountants during that time period, Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee also discussed with senior management and Ernst & Young LLP the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20142017 with management, including a review of the quality, in addition to the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee reviewed with Ernst & Young LLP, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, including the matters required to be discussed by statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1 AU Section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.States. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. In addition, the Audit Committee reviewed and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence, including the compatibility ofnon-audit services performed with the accountant’s independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent accountants the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Audit Committee has met with the independent accountants, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of the Company’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board of Directors approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20142017 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Audit Committee has appointed the firm of Ernst & Young LLP, independent, registered certified public accountants, as independent accountants to audit and report upon the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015.2018. The Company is requesting stockholder ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. In appointing Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s auditors for fiscal year 2015,2018, the Audit Committee has considered whether Ernst & Young LLP’s provision of services other than audit services is compatible with maintaining their independence.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

George L. Miles, Jr., Committee Chairman

Deborah H. McAneny

Susan P. McGalla

Morgan K. O’Brien

Steven E. Wheeler

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides an overview of the Company’s executive compensation programs for the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), President and Matthew D. Lawton and Manual A. de Zárraga, two of our Executive Managing Directors (collectively with the CEO and CFO, the “named executive officers” or “NEOs”)NEOs during fiscal year 2014,2017, together with a description of the material factors underlying the decisions which resulted in the 20142017 compensation provided to the Company’s NEOs, as presented in the tables that follow this CD&A. The following discussion and analysis contains statements regarding future individual and Company performance targets and goals. These targets and goals are disclosed in the limited context of the Company’s compensation programs and should not be understood to be statements of management’s expectations or estimates of financial results or other guidance. The Company specifically cautions investors not to apply these statements to other contexts.

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors is currently composed of fournon-employee directors, all of whom are independent directors under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission rules. The Committee has responsibility for determining and implementing the Company’s philosophy with respect to executive compensation. Accordingly, the Committee has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating the various components of the Company’s

executive compensation program. The Committee meetsMeetings are held at least twice per year (and more often as necessary) to discuss and review the compensation of the NEOs. The Committee annually reviews and approves the compensation of the CEO. The CommitteeCEO, and also reviews and approves the compensation of the other NEOs after considering the recommendations of the CEO. In establishing and reviewing compensation for the NEOs, the Committee considers, among other things, the financial results of the Company, recommendations of management and compensation data for comparable companies.

The Committee operates under a written charter originally adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on January 30, 2007 and last amended on May 23, 2013. A copy of this charter is posted on the Company’s website athttp://www.hfflp.com on the “Investor Relations” page.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

Since 2009, the Committee has engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“Cook & Co.”FW Cook”), an independent compensation consultant, to provide advice on executive compensation matters. All services provided by consultants to the Committee are conducted under the direction or authority of the Committee, and all work performed by compensation consultants must bepre-approved by the Committee.

The Compensation Committee annually assesses the independence of FW Cook & Co. does not provide any other servicespursuant to the Company,SEC Rules and neitherNYSE Listing Standards and in light of such rules has determined that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent FW Cook & Co. nor any members of its consulting team owns any shares of the Company’s common stock. There are no personal or business relationships between Cook & Co.’s employees and any executive of the Company. In addition, there are no personal or business relationships between Cook & Co.’s employees and any member offrom independently representing the Compensation Committee. Cook & Co. maintains a detailed conflict of interest policy in order to ensure that compensation committees receive conflict-free advice, and all of Cook & Co.’s employees were in compliance with such policy in 2014. Fees and expenses paid to Cook & Co. in 2014 in respect of consulting services toIn making this assessment, the Company were less than 1% of Cook & Co.’s total consulting income during that period. The Compensation Committee after taking into considerationconsidered all factors relevant to Cook & Co.‘sFW Cook’s independence, including but not limited to each of the factors specified in NYSE listing standards, confirmed that Cook & Co. is independent and determined that no conflicts of interest exist between Cook & Co.set forth by the SEC and the Company.NYSE with respect to the compensation consultant’s independence.

Compensation Philosophy — Mission and Vision Statement

In connection with setting the compensation for executive officers, the Company has adopted the philosophy set forth in the Mission and Vision Statement (see below) of the Operating Partnerships. The Mission and Vision Statement reflects our pay for value-added performance philosophy. We believe this Mission and Vision Statement is critical to our continued success. The foundation of our Mission and Vision Statement is based on the concept that a client’s interest must be placed ahead of ours or any individual’s working for us. Our goal is to hire and retain associates throughout the entire organization who have the highest ethical standards with the bestfinest reputation in the industry to preserve our culture of integrity, trust and respect. We endeavor to promote and encourage teamwork to ensure our clients have the best team on each transaction. Without the best people, we believe we cannot be the best firm and achieve superior results for our clients.

To enable us to achieve our goals, we believe that we must maintain a flexible compensation structure, including equity-based compensation awards, to appropriately recognize and reward our existing and future associates who profoundly affect our future success. We believe the ability to reward superior performance is essential if we want to provide superior results for our clients.

The Committee’s goals in structuring the Company’s compensation program for its NEOs are to:

The Committee has determined that to achieve these objectives, the Company’s executive compensation program should reward both individual and Company short-term and long-term performance. To this end, the Committee believes that executive compensation packages provided by the Company to its executive officers

should include both cash- and stock-based compensation. However, the Committee does not rely on any policy or formula in determining the appropriate mix of cash and equity compensation, nor does it rely on any policy or formula in allocating long-term compensation to different forms of awards.

Given the CEO’s, President’s, Mr. Lawton’sMessrs. Gibson, Thornton, Lawton and Mr. de Zárraga’sTepedino’s unique roles as both executive officers of the Company and transaction professionalscapital markets advisors of HFF LP, the Company’s executive compensation program operates in conjunction with the Company’s overall compensation system, which is intended to ensure continued significant and direct emphasis on annual production, to maintain and honor our partnership culture, to continue the alignment of employee, management and stockholder interests through our profit participation bonus plans and to enhance our succession plans for future leadership of the Company.

Setting Executive Compensation

In making compensation decisions, the Committee considers the recommendations of management.management and its independent consultant. The Committee also considers corporate and executive performance, an executive’s level of experience and responsibility, an executive’s current compensation level and historical compensation

practices. In addition, the Committee may look atconsider market data for comparable companies. The Committee does not attempt to maintain or target a specific percentile with respect to a particular peer group set of companies in determining compensation for NEOs. However, the Committee does periodically review information regarding compensation trends and levels from a variety of sources in making compensation decisions.

In 2014, the Committee engaged Cook & Co. to provide advice on executive compensation matters. At the same time, the Committee conducted an extensive review of the CEO’s compensation, considering CEO compensation at public companies in the professional services sector, including real estate service companies, with annual revenues between $100 million and $500 million as well as CB Richard Ellis Group and Jones Lang LaSalle, which consistently compete with us for top executive talent in the commercial real estate industry. This analysis included data on the following key elements of pay: (i) base salary, (ii) bonus, (iii) stock and option awards, (iv) non-equity incentive plan compensation and (v) all other compensation. The Committee reviewed the data, keenly aware of some of its limitation including, the limited number of companies in the “peer” subset, described above, and the significant differences in size and business scope between the Company and the “peer” subset. In connection with the CFO’s compensation, the Committee also reviewed compensation for the similar position from national general industry surveys.

The Committee also evaluates the performance of the Company’s CEO, CFO, President, Mr. Lawton and Mr. de ZárragaNEOs based on quantitative and qualitative performance criteria as described in more detail herein.

Compensation-Related Risk Assessment

In setting executivedeveloping the Company’s compensation policies, the Committee considers risks associated with paymentthe Company’s compensation practices. On an annual basis, the Committee and the Company conduct a risk assessment with respect to compensation of the executive compensation. officers. The risk assessment includes an analysis of the alignment of the Board’s expressed compensation philosophy and compensation goals with the Company’s strategic goals, short- and long-term focus and timing issues, compensation drivers and potential risks of each type of pay component, equity vesting periods, stock ownership and other factors.

The Committee takes steps to mitigate undue risk, including implementingthe presence of a clawback policy and stock ownership guidelines, as discussed in this CD&A. Many of the Company’s executive compensation plans are tied to the Company’s performance, incentivizing superior performance by rewarding income generation as well as the ability to control cost, and reducing the risk associated with a possible downturn in the markets in which the Company operates. Base salaries are fixed in amount and thus do not encourage risk-taking. Total executive base salary compensation paid with respect to 20142017 represented less than 15%10% of the total compensation paid to the CEO; less than 20% of the total compensation paid to the President; less than 60%35% of the total compensation paid to our CFO; less than 10%21% of the total compensation paid to Mr. Thornton; less than 7% of the total compensation paid to Mr. Lawton and less than 10%6% of the total compensation paid to Mr. de Zárraga,Tepedino, with the remainder being tied to performance. Our equity compensation programs have vesting periods based on years of service designed to ensure focus and promote long-term interests on our shareholders. The Committee believes the Company’s compensation policies discourage excessive risk-taking. Additionally, the Committee believes that none of the Company’s compensation programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company.

Consideration of Stockholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

In determining and approving compensation of our NEOs, the Committee monitors the results of the Company’s annual advisory vote on named executive compensation. The Company’s stockholders overwhelmingly approved our executive compensation program at our last annual meeting, with an approval rating of 82.7%98.5% of the shares represented at the meeting, with brokernon-votes not considered in the calculation.

Although this vote isnon-binding, the Committee viewed this strongsolid endorsement of our executive compensation decisions and policies as an additional factor supporting the Committee’s conclusion that our existing approach to executive compensation has been successful for the Company.

20142017 Executive Compensation Components

The Company’s executive compensation program is comprised of three core elements:

In making decisions with respect to any element of a NEO’s compensation, the Committee considers the total current compensation that such NEO may be awarded and any previously granted unvested equity awards. The Committee’s goal is to award compensation that is reasonable in relation to the Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives when all elements of potential compensation are considered.

Base Salaries

In General.General.     Base salary reflects the scope of job responsibility and theday-to-day performance of the executive officer relative to his or her duties and responsibilities. As a fixed component of compensation, base salary plays an important role in attracting and retaining executive talent. Given the lower base salaries, bonuses, if earned based on superior performance, are intended to be on the high end of competitive levels. In determining base salaries, the Committee considersCommittee’s practice is to review levels annually and consider several factors, including:including but not limited to:

The Committee’s practice is to review base salary levels annually.

2017 Annualized Base Salary Levels for Named Executive Officers

Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton and de ZárragaTepedino are also employed as transaction professionalscapital markets advisors of HFF LP, one of the two partnerships through which we conduct our business. Accordingly, theythese individuals are also paid for their respective service as a transaction professional.capital markets advisors. As is the case with all transaction professionals, eachcapital markets advisors of

HFF LP, their payments as a transaction professionalcompensation is based primarily upon commissions they earn for the capital markets services revenue that they bring intogenerate for HFF LP (as discussed in more detail below). In addition, Mr. Gibson is a licensed broker for HFF Securities, and is accordingly paid for his service in the form of commission payments. This isThese are both consistent with HFF LP’spay-for-performance policy, as the compensation earned by each of Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton and de Zárraga as a transaction professional, and Mr. Gibson as a licensed broker, is directly related to the amount of revenue they each generate for HFF LP and HFF Securities, respectively. policy. In addition, in order to attract and retain top producers, such as Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton and de Zárraga,Tepedino, it is critical that they share in the revenue and certain other income that they generate for the Operating Partnerships.

Subject to satisfying certain performance thresholds, Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, de Zárraga and Lawton and Tepedino and other transaction professionalscapital markets advisors may receive commission payments up to 50% of the adjusted collected fee amount that they generate for the Operating Partnerships. Under this policy, the adjusted collected fee amount is determined based upon the gross revenue actually received by the Operating Partnerships attributable to the efforts of such transaction professionalscapital markets advisors and after payment of all customary and appropriate fee splits with outside cooperating brokers or others. The adjusted collected fee amount is also reduced by related transaction professionalcapital markets advisor expenses, including all applicable management plan payments, bonus pool payments to analysts, splits with other transaction professionalcapital markets advisor and employees, and other similar compensation paid or payable to individuals involved in the generation of any commission revenue. Messrs. Gibson, Thornton, de Zárraga and Lawton, and Mr. Pelusi during 2014 until his resignation effective April 1, 2014, are the only transaction professionals who also serve as a NEO and whose compensation is directly reviewed and approved by the Committee. The Committee considers Messrs. Pelusi’s, Gibson’s, Thornton’s, de Zárraga’sLawton’s and Lawton’sTepedino’s total compensation relative to that of other top Company transaction professionals so ascapital markets advisors to balance the fact that each of them, by reason of their services as executive officers, must redirect much of their focus and efforts to their executive officer responsibilities as opposed to their own individual production.

The annual base salary of our CFO, Gregory R. Conley, was $375,000 in 2014. During 2012 and 2013, Mr. Conley was paid an annual salary of $250,000 and $350,000, respectively. Among the factors considered by the Committee in establishing his base salary were Mr. Conley’s base salary and total compensation as they compare to those paid to the chief financial officers and other corresponding persons of the Company’s competitors and other “peer” companies, as well as his skills and experience, historical base salary and performance as CFO of the Company. After reviewing Mr. Conley’s compensation and consulting with the CEO, the Committee decided to increase Mr. Conley’s annual base salary for 2015 to $425,000.

Bonuses

In General.    General.     Annual cash and equity-based bonuses are included as part of the executive compensation program to ensure that a significant portion of each NEO’s compensation is contingent on the annual performance of the Company, as well as the individual contribution of the NEO. The Committee believes that this structure is appropriate because it aligns the interests of management and stockholders by rewarding executives for strong annual performance by the Company. Bonuses, if earned based on superior performance, are intended to be on the high end of competitive levels to compensate for lower base salaries.

In addition to our regular bonus program, in connection with their services as a transaction professionalcapital markets advisor with HFF LP, each of Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, de ZárragaLawton and LawtonTepedino are eligible for an annual bonus through the Operating Partnership Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan, and each of Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Conley, Thornton, Conley, de ZárragaLawton and LawtonTepedino are eligible for an annual bonus through HFF Inc.’s Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan.

20142017 Performance Bonuses

The regular bonus program is comprised of two parts,In 2017, the base plan andCompensation Committee granted performance bonuses in accordance with the Supplemental Leadership TeamExecutive Bonus Plan which was adopted in 2013. The Supplemental Leadership Team(the “Executive Bonus Plan affords membersPlan”). Upon the grant of an Executive Bonus to an eligible recipient, a recipient receives 50% of the Executiveaward in cash, payable immediately, and Leadership Committees (or any similar future committees) established by the Company, the Operating Partnerships or any other affiliate50% of the Company and who participateaward in RSUs, the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan the opportunity to earn an additional bonus based on the achievement of certain financial targets

established by the Compensation Committee.latter vesting over three years in equalone-third installments. The bonus amount for 2014 was $560,000. The Supplemental Leadership TeamExecutive Bonus Plan is administered by the Board of Directors (or an appropriate committee thereof) and all decisions of the Board with respect to the administration of the Supplemental Leadership TeamExecutive Bonus Plan are final, conclusive and binding on all persons, including the Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates, any employee and any persons claiming rights from or through employees of the Company.

Members of the Executive and Leadership CommitteesCommittee (or any similar committeescommittee established in the future) established by the Company, the Operating Partnerships or any other affiliate of the Company are eligible to participate in and receive a bonus payment under the Supplemental Leadership TeamExecutive Bonus Plan (a “Supplemental Leadership Team Bonus”). ThePlan. In 2017, the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer,CEO, Mark D. Gibson, current President, Joe B. Thornton, Jr., former Chief Executive Officer, John H. Pelusi, Jr. and current Executive Managing Directors H. Scott Galloway, Matthew D. Lawton, Gerard T. Sansosti, Michael J. Tepedino and Manuel A. de Zárraga arewere members of the Executive Committee and arewere eligible for Supplemental Leadership TeamExecutive Bonuses. The Company’s Chief Financial Officer,CFO, Gregory R. Conley, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), Nancy O. Goodson, as well as the Company’s director emeritus John P. Fowler, arewere ad hoc members of the Executive Committee and arewere also eligible for such bonuses.

In connection with determining the 20142017 bonus amount for Messrs. Gibson, Thornton, de ZárragaLawton and LawtonTepedino and the other voting members of the Executive Committee and Mr. Conley, the Committee established an executive bonusExecutive Bonus pool of $3,560,000 (from the combined base target bonus pool of $3,000,000 and Supplemental Leadership Team Bonus Plan pool of $560,000)$5,000,000 with the actual bonus paid to be based upon the achievement ofpre-established individual and Company-level objectives. In particular, their bonuses were dependent on performance in connection with (i) maximizing stockholder value while ensuring adherence to the Company’s Vision and Mission Statement, (ii) exploring and developing strategic alternatives for the Company’s growth and future profitability and enhanced stockholder value, (iii) ensuring that the Company’s strategic plan and budget are fully developed, presented and implemented, following approval by the Board of Directors and that the Board of Directors is apprised of and involved in all key strategic initiatives and/or issues that were not part of the strategic plan and budget as they arise, (iv) managingfostering continued strong investor relations and communications efforts and supporting the Company’s stock in the institutional and analyst community, (v) identifying succession planning candidates through continued implementation of the Company’s Leadership Team Committee and new internal management structure and developing a multi-year management and succession plan for such candidates, (vi) managing all public company and Operating Partnerships operations, and (vii) meeting certain financial targets (i.e. budgeted revenue, operating income and adjustedAdjusted EBITDA) of the Company. In addition, the bonuses for Messrs. Gibson, Thornton, de ZárragaLawton and LawtonTepedino and the other voting members of the Executive Committee, specifically, were also dependent on performance in connection with building a strong working relationship with the CFO and COO and supportingcontinuing to support their greater involvement in the implementation of the Company’s strategic business goals and objectives.

After considering the outstanding 20142017 performance of each of Messrs. Gibson, Thornton, Lawton, de Zárraga,Tepedino, Conley and the Company in light of the individual and Company-level objectives established by the Committee and reviewing Messrs. Gibson’s, Thornton’s, Lawton’s, de Zárraga’sTepedino’s and Conley’s compensation, and considering peer company information, the Committee approved an executive bonus, split evenly between cash and RSUs, in cash of $750,000 for Mr. Gibson, an executive bonus in cash of $750,000 for Mr. Thornton, an executive bonus in cash of $425,000 for Mr. Lawton, an executive bonus in cash of $425,000 for Mr. de Zárraga and an executive bonus in cash of $110,000 for Mr. Conley. the aggregate as follows:

The Committee determined that these bonus amounts were appropriate in light of the Company’s performance discussed above, which included exceeding certain budgeted goals and the payment of a special dividend, and Messrs. Gibson’s, Thornton’s, Lawton’s, de Zárraga’sTepedino’s, and Conley’s contributions to that performance.¹

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Conley is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus in an amount up to 50% of his base salary. The Committee may also, in its discretion, establish target bonuses and award performance bonuses in excess of such amounts. The Committee set Mr. Conley’s target 20142017 bonus opportunitiesopportunity at $187,000,$244,625, or 50% of his base salary. In connection with determining Mr. Conley’s actual bonus payout, the Committee consulted with the CEO and considered his impressionassessment of the CFO’s performance, as outlined in a written performance review of Mr. Conley. The performance factors considered by the Committee

in connection with awarding such incentive bonuses included the CFO’s (i) implementation and execution of the Company’s business plan, (ii) managing and recommending improvements in the Company’s operations, including the Company’s credit facilities, and internal efficiencies, (iii) managing and administering the Company’s support functions including assisting with the opening of offices in Philadelphia and Charlotte, as well as expansion and renewals of offices in several other cities, and (iv) individual performance and achievements. In connection with awarding a bonus to Mr. Conley separate from the Executive Bonus described above, the Committee also considered his performance in connection with the preparation of the Company’s financial statements and maintaining effective internal controls. After considering Mr. Gibson’s recommendations, competitive data provided by the consultant and the performance factors noted above, the Committee approved a cash bonus of $200,000$450,000 for Mr. Conley, or 106%approximately 184% of his target bonus. The Committee determined that this bonus amount was appropriate in light of the strong performance of Mr. Conley in his areas of responsibility.

The Compensation Committee, starting with the 2015 awards, currently expects to combine the base bonus and Supplemental Leadership Team Bonus into a single bonus (an “Executive Bonus”) for eligible recipients. Upon the grant of an Executive Bonus to an eligible recipient, such recipient would receive 50% of the award in cash, payable immediately, and 50% of the award in restricted shares, the latter to be vested over the course of three years for those award recipients who hold less than 300,000 restricted shares of common stock of the Company. The Committee expects to implement this change to provide for consistency with the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan (as described below). By implementing this practice, the Compensation Committee expects to ensure that the eligible recipients for the Executive Bonus receive such awards in a similar fashion to the recipients of awards under the Firm Profit Participation Plan.

Profit Participation Bonus Plans

Operating Partnership Profit Participation Bonus Plans.    Plans. The Profit Participation Bonus Plan of each of HFF LP and HFF Securities (each, an “Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan”) is designed to reward an office or line of business for an exceptionally productive year. In addition, the Office Profit Participation Bonus Plans reward income generation as well as the ability of an office or line of business to control costs. This element of compensation is integral to HFF LP’s and HFF Securities’Securities��� compensation practices because it provides an understandable incentive to each of our offices and lines of business and allows us to reward superior performance. Each Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan generally provides that offices or lines of business that generate profit margins for their office or line of business of 14.5% or more are entitled to additional bonuses of an allocated share of 15% of net income from the office. The allocation of the profit participation bonus and how it is shared within the office are determined by the office head in consultation with the managing member of the Operating Partnerships. In addition, in January 2011April 2015 the Company amended each Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan such that the Board, or any appropriate committee thereof, may elect to pay up to one-third50% of the profit participation bonuses payable under the applicable Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan in the form of equity-based awards pursuant to the Company’s then-effective 2006 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2006 Plan”) (or any other compensation plan adopted by the Company under which equity securities of the Company are authorized)authorized, which now includes the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”)), which awards may be subject to delayed vesting schedules. The Compensation Committee’s practice for 2014 awards, however, subject to the Committee’s future consideration and approval at the time of each grant, is that if a recipient owned greater than 300,000 shares of Class A common stock at the time of grant, the recipient is paid the full amount of the profit participation bonus in cash in lieu of equity-based awards, although one-third of such cash payment payable is be subject to a similar delayed vesting schedule as that applicable to portions of profit participation bonuses paid in the form of equity-based awards that year. The Compensation Committee’s practice starting withfrom the 2015 awards, however, subject to the Committee’s future consideration and approval at the time of each grant, is that, upon grantwas to an eligible recipient, such recipient is to receiveprovide 50% of the award in cash, payable immediately, and 50% of the award in equity (in the form of RSUs), the latter to be vested over the course of three years, one third of the award each yearvest inone-third installments beginning on the first anniversary of each grant.

Messrs. Gibson, Thornton, de ZárragaLawton and LawtonTepedino are eligible to participate in the Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan. Mr. GibsonPlan and each received an office profit participation bonus under the Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan of $525,600 in 20152018 related to 2014 performance. Mr. Thornton received an office profit participation bonus under the Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan of $500,600 in 2015 related to 2014 performance. Mr. de Zárraga’s office profit participation bonus was $349,202 in 2015 related to 2014

performance. Mr. Lawton’s office profit participation bonus was $510,751 in 2015 related to 2014 performance. Because each of Mr. Gibson, Mr. Thornton and Mr. Lawton owned greater than 300,000 shares of Class A common stock at the time of grant, each of them will be paid the full amount of the profit participation bonus in cash in lieu of equity-based awards, and one third of each such cash payment payable is subject to a similar delayed vesting schedule as that applicable to portions of profit participation bonuses paid in the form of equity-based awards for that year. Because Mr. de Zárraga owned less than 300,000 shares of Class A common stock at the time of grant, Mr. de Zárraga’s office profit participation bonus was paid two-thirds in cash, payable immediately, and one third in restricted shares of the Company’s Class A common stock under the 2006 Plan. Twenty-five percent

One-third of the equity portions of the profit participation bonuses vested immediately and seventy-five percent will vest on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of February 18, 2016.27, 2018.

Firm Profit Participation Plan.    Plan.    In January 2011, the Company adopted the HFF, Inc. Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan (the “Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan”), under which members of the Executive and Leadership Committees (or any similar committees established in the future) established by the Company, the Operating Partnerships or any other affiliate of the Company, which include each of our CEO, CFO, President, CFO, Mr. Lawton and Mr. de Zárraga,Tepedino, are eligible for an annual bonus. The purpose of the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan is to encourage and reward firm-wide collaboration and broad stewardship and to promote the financial success of the Company and the Operating Partnerships as well as succession planning for the future. For each calendar year, if the Company achieves a 17.5% or greater adjusted operating income margin, a bonus pool is funded by a percentage of the Company’s adjusted operating income, ranging from 15% to 25%, beyond predefined adjusted operating income margin thresholds, ranging from 17.5% to 27.5%. The Board, or any appropriate committee thereof, may elect to pay up totwo-thirds of the profit participation bonuses payable under the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan in the form of equity-based awards pursuant to the 20062016 Plan (or any other compensation plan adopted by the Company under which equity securities of the Company are authorized). The Compensation Committee’s practice for 2014 awards, however, subject to the Committee’s future consideration and approval at the time of each grant, is that if a recipient owned greater than 300,000 shares of Class A common stock at the time of grant, the recipient is paid the full amount of the profit participation bonus in cash in lieu of equity-based awards, although one-third of such cash payment payable is subject to a similar delayed vesting schedule as that applicable to portions of profit participation bonuses paid in the form of equity-based awards that year. The Compensation Committee’s practice starting with the 2015 awards, however, subject to the Committee’s future consideration and approval at the time of each grant, is that, upon grant to an eligible recipient, such recipient is to receive 50% of the award in cash, payable immediately, and 50% of the award in equity (in the form of RSUs), the latter to be vestedvest in equal annual installments over the course of three years one third of the award each year beginning on the first anniversary of each grant.

Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton, de ZárragaTepedino and Conley are each eligible to participate in the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan. Mr. PelusiPlan and each received a profit participation bonus under the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan of $325,000 in 20152018 related to 2014 performance. Because Mr. Pelusi owned less than 300,000 shares2017 performance as follows:

One-third of Class A common stock at the time of grant, his profit participation bonus was paid one-third in cash and two-thirds in equity. Fifty percent of the each of the cash and equity portion of the award vested immediately and the remaining fifty percent will vest on February 18, 2016. Mr. Conley received a profit participation bonus under the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan of $60,000 in 2015 related to 2014 performance. Because Mr. Conley owned less than 300,000 shares of Class A common stock at the time of grant, his profit participation bonus was paid one-third in cash and two-thirds in restricted shares of the Company’s Class A common stock under the 2006 Plan. Fifty percent of each of the cash and equity portions of the profit participation bonus vested immediately upon grant and fifty percentbonuses will vest on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of February 18, 2016. Mr. Lawton received a profit participation bonus under the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan of $100,000 in 2015 related to 2014 performance. Because Mr. Lawton owned greater than 300,000 shares of Class A common stock at the time of grant, his profit participation bonus will be paid in cash, 50% of which vested immediately upon grant and 50% of which will vest on March 18, 2016.27, 2018.

Long-Term Incentive Program

Our Board of Directors believes that compensation paid to executive officers should be closely aligned with our performance on both a short-term and long-term basis, and that their compensation should assist us in

recognizing and rewarding key executives who profoundly affect our future success through their value-added performances. Therefore, we have adopted and maintain an incentive compensation plan, the 20062016 Plan. This plan is designed to align management’s performance objectives with the interests of our stockholders. Awards under our 20062016 Plan are administered by the Committee.

All grants of equity compensation to NEOs, including those made in connection with the Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan and the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan, are made by the Committee. Whether grants are made and the type and size of any grants are based upon Company and individual performance, position held, years of service, level of experience and potential of future contribution to the Company’s success. The Committee may also consider long-term incentive grants previously awarded to the NEOs, long-term incentive grants given to other executive officers throughout the Company’s history and grant practices at comparable companies.

20142017 Equity Grants

As described above, in February 2015, Mr. Conley was granted 1,071 restricted shares of2018, the Company’s Class A common stock with a grant date fair value of $40,013Company made certain equity grants under the 20062016 Plan as part of his 2014the 2017 profit participation bonuses. One-half of the restricted shares vested immediately upon grantbonuses and one-half of the restricted shares will vest on February 18, 2016. In February 2015, Mr. Pelusi was granted 5,799 restricted shares of the Company’s Class A common stock with a grant date fair value of $216,651 under the 2006 Planexecutive bonuses as part of his 2014 profit participation bonuses. One-half of the restricted shares vested immediately upon grant and one-half of the restricted shares will vest on February 18, 2016. In February 2015, Mr. de Zárraga was granted 3,116 restricted shares of the Company’s Class A common stock with a grant date fair value of $116,414 under the 2006 Plan as part of his 2014 profit participation bonuses. Twenty-five percent of the restricted shares vested immediately upon grant and seventy-five percent of the restricted shares will vest on February 18, 2016. In addition, as described above, in February 2015, Mr. Conley was granted 3,750 restricted shares of the Company’s Class A common stock with a grant date fair value of $140,100 under the 2006 Plan as part of his 2014 performance bonuses. Each of Mr. Lawton and Mr. de Zárraga were granted 7,143 restricted shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, each with a grant date fair value of $266,862 under the 2006 Plan as part of his 2014 performance bonuses. Twenty-five percentfollows:

One-third of each of Messrs Conley’s, Lawton’s and de Zárraga’s restricted shares granted under the 2006 Planawards will vest on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of February 18, 2017, February 18, 2018, February 18, 2019 and February 18, 2020.27, 2018.

The Company has no formal program, plan or practice to time equity grants to its executives in coordination with the release of materialnon-public information.

Other Compensation and Perquisite Benefits

In addition to the principal categories of compensation described above, the Company provides its NEOs with coverage under its broad-based health and welfare benefits plans, including medical, dental, vision, disability and life insurance. The Company also sponsors a 401(k) plan. The 401(k) plan is atax-qualified retirement savings plan pursuant to which all employees, including the NEOs, are able tomay contribute to the 401(k) plan up to the limit prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code on abefore-tax basis.

All contributions made by a participant vest immediately and matching contributions by the Company made prior to April 1, 2009 were, and following October 1, 2010 are fully vested after two years of service. These benefits are not tied to any individual or corporate performance objectives and are intended to be part of an overall competitive compensation program.

The NEOs are not generally entitled to benefits that are not otherwise available to all of our employees. In this regard, the Company does not provide pension arrangements (other than the 401(k) Plan), post-retirement health coverage or similar benefits for its executives.

Employment Agreements

A description of the employment agreements of our NEOs during 20142017 at HFF, Inc., including a specific description of the components of each such named executive officer’sNEO’s compensation, is set forthincluded in the Employment Agreements section below. As discussed above, Mr. Pelusi ceased to be an executive officer of the Company as of April 1, 2014.

Clawback Policy

In 2013, the Committee adopted a clawback policy that covers the executive performance bonus and Supplemental Leadership Team Bonus pools,pool, which requires that payouts under the executive performance bonus guidelines and the Supplemental Leadership Team Bonus Plan shall not be adjusted based on any information that becomes available at any time following the Determination Datedetermination date of such payout amount, absent fraud, accounting irregularities, willful misconduct, gross negligence or manifest error, provided that, for two years following the awarding of any bonus amount under such plans, the award will be subject to a total clawback in the event that there is a material restatement of the Company’s financial statements for the applicable fiscal year.

For further detail regarding the OfficerOffice Profit Participation Bonus Plans and the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan, see the description under “Profit Participation Bonus Plans” below.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

On January 9, 2013, the Committee adopted a policy requiring that the Company’s CEO must own common stock of the Company equal in value to at least five times such CEO’s annual base salary. New CEOs will have up tosalary within a period of five years from the date electedelected. In addition, based upon their roles, NEOs are required to acquire such amountown shares of the Company’s common stock equal to at least 55% of theafter-tax shares received by the NEO pursuant to equity-based compensation awards, unless the NEO’s holdings already exceed a minimum number of shares based on the lower of a (i) minimum share count or (ii) minimum dollar holding. Shares that count towards satisfaction of the Company.requirements include (i) RSUs shares which have vested and are owned outright, (ii) vested RSUs held in trust for the benefit of the NEO and his or her family and (iii) shares received by a NEO, net of tax withholding, pursuant to equity-based compensation awards awarded by the Company to the NEO. Unrestricted RSUs, even if vested andin-the-money, are not counted in the determination of the satisfaction of the guidelines. Ownership in an amount greater than the stated level is encouraged.

As of April 17, 2018, when the price per share of our Class A common stock at the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange was $48.58, each of Messrs. Gibson, Conley, Thornton, Jr, Lawton and Tepedino were in compliance with the applicable policy or guideline.

Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policies

The Company prohibits directors, officers and employees, including our NEOs, from engaging in hedging or pledging transactions involving our stock.

Tax and Accounting Implications

Deductibility of Certain Compensation

For 2017, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the federal tax deductions that may be claimed by a public company for compensation paid to certain individuals to $1,000,000 except to the extent that any excess compensation exceeding such threshold is “performance-based compensation.” In 2014,2017, the NEOs’ base salarysalaries and bonuses were not considered performance-based under Section 162(m) and therefore all such compensation is subject to the $1,000,000 limit. The CEO’s and President’s commission payments are exempt from the 162(m) limits and Profit Participation Bonus Plan amounts earned by the CEO and President, and paid by the Operating Partnerships, are not subject to the Section 162(m) limits. limits and commission payments for these individuals are exempt.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, passed by Congress in December 2017, eliminated the “performance-based” compensation exemption under Section 162(m). Therefore, for 2018 and beyond, compensation paid to our CEO, our CFO and to each of our other NEOs will not be deductible for federal income tax purposes to the extent such compensation exceeds $1,000,000, regardless of whether such compensation would have been considered “performance-based” under prior law. This limitation on deductibility applies to each individual who is a “covered employee” (as defined in Section 162(m)) in 2017 or becomes a covered employee in any future year, and continues to apply to each such individual for all future years, regardless of whether such individual remains an NEO. There is, however, a transition rule that allows “performance-based” compensation in excess of $1,000,000 to continue to be deductible if the remuneration is provided pursuant to a binding contract which was in effect on November 2, 2017 and which was not subsequently materially modified. The Committee believes

that our stockholders’ interests are best served by not restricting the Committee’s discretion in structuring compensation programs, and thus the Committee intends to maintain flexibility to pay compensation that is not entirely deductible when the best interests of the Company make that advisable. In approving the amount and form of compensation for the NEOs, the Committee will continue to consider all elements of cost to the Company of providing such compensation, including the potential impact of Section 162(m).

The Committee considers the accounting impact in connection with equity compensation matters; however, these considerations do not significantly affect decisions onregarding grants of equity compensation.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or “incorporated by reference” in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis with our management and, based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Lenore M. Sullivan, Committee Chairman

George L. Miles, Jr.

Steven E. WheelerDeborah H. McAneny

Morgan K. O’Brien

OUR MISSION AND VISION STATEMENT

Our goal is to always put the client’s interest ahead of the Firm and every individual within the Firm.

We will endeavor to strategically grow to achieve our objective of becoming the best and most dominant “one-stop”“one-stop” commercial real estate and capital markets intermediary offering the following:

Our goal is to hire and retain associates who have the highest ethical standards and the best reputations in the industry to preserve our culture of integrity, trust and respect and to promote and encourage teamwork to ensure our clients have the “best team on the field” for each transaction. Simply stated, without the best people, we cannot be the best Firm.

To ensure we achieve our goals and aspirations and provide outstanding results for our stockholders, we must maintain a flexible compensation and ownership package to appropriately recognize and reward our existing and future associates who profoundly contribute to our success through their value-added performance. The ability to reward extraordinary performance is essential in providing superior results for our clients while appropriately aligning our interests with our stockholders.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth the compensation earned during fiscal 2012, 20132015, 2016 and 20142017 by our named executive officers for each of those fiscal years: John H. Pelusi, Jr., our prior Chief Executive Officer; Mark D. Gibson, our Chief Executive Officer, from April 1, 2014, Gregory R. Conley, our Chief Financial Officer; Joe B. Thornton, Jr., our President, Manuel A. de Zárraga, our Executive Managing Director and Matthew D. Lawton, our Executive Managing Director. As previously discussed in this Proxy Statement, Mr. Pelusi has resigned asDirector, and Michael J. Tepedino, our Chief Executive Officer effective April 1, 2014.Managing Director.

(4)

Represents Mr. Pelusi’s commissionsSee the “All Other Compensation Summary Table” below for a description of $858,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. Includes Mr. Pelusi’s performance bonus of $2,250,000, commissions of $394,539 and bonus of $3,417 under the Supplemental Leadership Team Bonus Plan for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013; and performance bonus of $2,250,000 and commissions of $753,541 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.other compensation amounts paid.

(14)	This amount includes $434 in imputed income on group term life insurance premiums, $500,600 in profit participation bonuses under the Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan, $202 in life insurance premiums and $5,000 in a 401(k) match paid by us in 2014.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Summary Table

Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Summary Table

All Other Compensation Summary Table

Mr. de Zárraga’s 2013 and 2014 award was paid in restricted shares of the Company’s Class A common stock with a grant date (March 3, 2014 and February 18, 2015, respectively) fair value of $81,676 (2,565 shares at $31.84/share on March 3, 2014) and of $116,401 (3,116 shares at $37.36/share on February 18, 2015), respectively. Mr. de Zárraga’s Office Profit Participation Bonus awards in respect of 2013 and 2012 are reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column of the table.

Pay Ratio Disclosure

Federal law requires that we disclose the ratio of our CEO’s total compensation to the total compensation of our median employee (excluding the CEO). The pay ratio below is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the applicable rules based upon our internal records and the methodology described below. Except as specified below, to determine this ratio, we utilized the full-time, part-time and temporary employees of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries employed as of December 31, 2017. Under the de minimus exception, we excluded approximately 18 employees in the United Kingdom, which represents less than five percent of our total employee population. In addition, we excluded approximately 8 individuals that became our employees during 2017 as a result of the Company’s acquisition of Hentschel & Company, LLC.

The Company identified its median employee by using total compensation from the Company’s payroll records as of December 31, 2017. No assumptions, adjustments, or estimates with respect to compensation were made, except that the compensation was annualized for all full-time employees who began employment during 2017. The median employee’s total compensation was recalculated using the same methodology used to calculate the total compensation of the CEO as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table included in the Executive Compensation section of this Proxy Statement. The median employee‘s total compensation was $119,516, and the total compensation of the CEO was $5,173,005. Accordingly, the ratio of the annual total compensation of the CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the Company, except the CEO, is 43:1.

The rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. Therefore, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

Employment Agreements

John H. Pelusi, Jr., Mark D. Gibson, Joe B. Thornton, Jr., Matthew D. Lawton Manuel A. de Zárragaand Michael J. Tepedino

HFF LP and each of Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton and de ZárragaTepedino are parties to an amended and restated employment agreement in respect of Messrs. Pelusi’s, Gibson’s, Thornton’s, Lawton’s and de Zárraga’s, as the case may be,their capacity as transaction professionalscapital markets advisors on terms and conditions substantially identical to the employment agreements between HFF LP and the members of HFF Holdings who were employed as transaction professionalscapital markets advisors at the time of our initial public offering. Such employment agreements were amended on June 30, 2010 when, in connection with the modification of the Exchange Right described in “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — Exchange Right,” Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton and de Zárraga and certain other members of HFF Holdings voluntarily agreed to extend the term of the non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions under their employment agreements until March 2015.2010.

Each of Messrs. Pelusi’s, Gibson’s, Thornton’s, Lawton’s and de Zárraga’s employmentThe agreements provide for salary, bonuses, commission sharing, draws against commissions, bonuses and other income allocations as established from time to time by Holliday GP at the direction of our Board of Directors after consideration of the recommendation and advice of the operating committee and managing member of HoldCo LLC. Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton and de ZárragaThe four executives are each provided with the welfare benefits and other fringe benefits to the same extent as those benefits are provided to our other similarly situated employees.

As discussed in “Non-Competition, Non-Disclosure, Non-Solicitation and Other Restrictive Covenants” below, certain non-competition and non-solicitation obligations of Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton and de Zárraga under their respective employment agreements, as amended (as well as similar obligations of other members of HFF Holdings under their respective employment agreements), terminated in March 2015.

The Company did not enter into a new employment agreementsagreement with each of Mr. Gibson and Mr. Thornton in respect of theirhis current service as the Company’s respective CEO and President. The Company did not enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Pelusi in respect of his prior service as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.CEO.

Gregory R. Conley

We have an employment agreement with Gregory R. Conley. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement with HFF, Inc., Mr. Conley serves as our Chief Financial OfficerCFO until his employment is terminated by us or by Mr. Conley.

The compensation package of Mr. Conley is comprised of the following elements:

We currently do not have employment agreements with certain other key associates and there is no assurance that we will be able to retain their services.

Non-Competition, Non-Disclosure, Non-SolicitationNon-Disparagement and Other Restrictive Covenants

In March 2015, the non-competition, non-solicitation and other restrictive covenants as discussed in more detail below expired. After discussion with our transaction professionals, management and review by our independent directors, we decided not to renew these provisions prior to their expiration.

Pursuant to the employment agreements described above, we had entered into non-competition, non-disclosure, non-solicitationnon-disparagement and other restrictive covenants with Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton and de ZárragaTepedino andnon-disclosure and other restrictive covenants with Mr. Conley. The following are descriptions of the material terms of each covenant, which terminated in March 2015.covenant.

The non-competition, non-disclosure, non-solicitationnon-disparagement and other restrictive covenants provided as follows:

Non-Competition.    Non-DisclosurePrior to March 29, 2015, each.    Each of Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton, and de Zárraga were not permitted to, directly or indirectly, own, operate, manage, participate in, invest in, render services for or otherwise assist any entity that engages in any competitive business that we or our affiliates are in or are actively considering conducting during a six-month period preceding the termination date of their respective employment. Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton and de Zárraga were also prohibited by the terms of the non-competition covenant from directly or indirectly engaging in any activity that requires or would inevitably require the disclosure of confidential information of us or our affiliates. This non-competition covenant did not apply if any of them were terminated by us without “cause” (as defined in the employment agreement).

Non-Disclosure.    Each of Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton, de ZárragaTepedino and Conley wereare required, whether during or after histheir employment, to hold all “confidential information” in trust for us and wereare prohibited from using or disclosing such confidential information except as necessary in the regular course of our business or that of our affiliates.

Non-Solicitation.    Non-DisparagementPrior to March 29, 2015, each.    Each of Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton, and de Zárraga were not permitted to, directly or indirectly, solicit the business of or perform duties for any client or prospective client of ours in respect of any service similar to a service performed by us or our affiliates. “Prospective client” means any person with which we or our affiliates were in active business discussions at any time within six months

prior to the termination date of their respective employment. Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton and de Zárraga were also prohibited from influencing or encouraging any of our clients or prospective clients from ceasing to do business with us during this same time period. This non-solicitation covenant did not apply if any of them are terminated by us without “cause” (as defined in the employment agreement).

Pursuant to their employment agreements, each of Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton and de Zárraga were also not permitted to, directly or indirectly, knowingly solicit or encourage any of our employees or consultants to leave their employment with us, or hire any such employee or consultant prior to March 29, 2015.

Non-Disparagement.    Each of Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton, de ZárragaTepedino and Conley wereare not permitted to, except as legally compelled, make any statement to third parties that would have a material adverse impact on the business or business reputation of, as the case may be, Mr.Messrs. Gibson, Mr. Thornton, Mr. Pelusi,Lawton and Mr.Tepedino and Conley or any of us or our affiliates.

Specific Performance.    Performance.    In the case of any breach of the employment agreement, including thenon-competition,non-disclosure,non-solicitation and other restrictive covenants thereof, Messrs. Pelusi, Gibson, Thornton, Lawton, de ZárragaTepedino and Conley each agreed that, in addition to any other right we may have at law, equity or under any agreement, we would beare entitled to immediate injunctive relief and may obtain a temporary or permanent injunction or other restraining order.

Potential Payments Upon Termination

Mr. Conley’s employment agreement contains provisions providing for payments by us following the termination of his employment by us without cause or by Mr. Conley for good reason. Under Mr. Conley’s employment agreement, if his employment is terminated by us without cause or by such executive with good reason, he will be entitled to receive his base salary through the date of termination and for a subsequent period of twelve months, the benefits provided under our employee benefit plans and programs, continuation of medical benefits for twelve months after the date of termination, vesting of 50% or 100% of his unvested restricted stock unitsRSUs or stock options, if any, and 90 days to exercise any vested stock options, if any. In addition, any restricted stock unitsRSUs or stock options granted will become 100% vested if his position is eliminated or compensation is reduced following a change in control. “Cause” is defined under the employment agreement as (i) gross misconduct or gross negligence in the performance of one’s duties as our employee, (ii) conviction or pleading nolo contendere to a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude, (iii) significant nonperformance of an executive’s duties as our employee, (iv) material violation of our established policies and procedures or (v) material violation of the respective employment agreement. “Good reason” is defined under the respective employment agreements as (i) a significant reduction of duties or authority, (ii) a reduction in base salary without the executive’s consent, (iii) a reduction in the executive’s bonus opportunity, (iv) a significant change in the location of the executive’s principal place of employment and (v) material violation of the respective employment agreements.

If the employment of Mr. Conley is terminated for any reason other than by us without cause or by Mr. Conley for good reason (including by us with cause, by Mr. Conley without good reason, or due to death or disability), Mr. Conley will only be entitled to all earned, unpaid base salary and the benefits provided under our employee benefit plans and programs. Mr. Conley will be permitted to exercise vested stock options for a period of 30 days following termination due to a voluntary resignation and for a period of one year following a termination due to death or disability. For a termination due to cause, Mr. Conley will not be permitted to exercise any of his stock options following termination. Except as otherwise provided above, unvested restricted stock unitsRSUs and stock options will be forfeited upon a termination for any reason.

Each of Mr. Gibson’s, Mr. Thornton’s, Mr. Lawton’s Mr. de Zárraga’s and Mr. Pelusi’sTepedino’s employment agreements does not provide for any potential severance payments by us upon the termination of their respective employment.

The Company does not provide excise taxgross-up payments to anyone under an existing employment agreement or otherwise.

In connection with a termination of employment by us without cause or by Mr. Conley for good reason, Mr. Conley is entitled to receive acceleration of certain of his outstanding equity awards pursuant to the terms of such equity award agreements, consistent with the terms described below relating to our other NEOs. Mr. Conley’s compensation that would have been owed to him in the event of (a) his employment termination without cause or (b) by Mr. Conley with good reason on December 31, 20142017 was $375,000$489,250 as a continuation of base salary, $26,966$32,157 as a continuation of benefits and $422,850approximately $1,220,000 in accelerated restricted stockRSU vesting. The employment agreements with the other NEOs do not contain similar severance provisions.

Pursuant to the terms of certain equity awards made to each of Mr. Gibson, Mr. Thornton, Mr. Lawton and Mr. Tepedino, upon (a) a termination of the executive’s employment (x) without cause or due to permanent disability, (y) for good reason or (z) due to death or (b) a termination of the executive’s employment during the twenty-four months following a change in control either (x) without cause or (y) due to disability or as the result of death, unvested RSUs will become fully vested upon the date of termination and will be settled within 60 days following the date of such termination.

With respect to such equity awards, “Cause” is generally defined as (i) gross misconduct or gross negligence in the performance of the executive’s duties under their employment agreement; (ii) conviction of a crime; (iii) significant nonperformance of the executive’s duties under their employment agreement; (iv) material violation of our established policies and procedures and (v) material violation of the terms of the executive’s employment agreement. Furthermore, “Good Reason” is defined under the respective equity awards as (i) a significant reduction of the executive’s duties or authority, (ii) a reduction in base salary without the executive’s consent, (iii) a reduction in the executive’s bonus opportunity and (iv) a significant change in the location of the executive’s principal place of employment.

Assuming one of the terminations described in clauses (a) or (b) above occurred on December 31, 2017, the value of accelerated equity awards due would be as follows: Mr. Gibson would receive $2,080,000, Mr. Thornton would receive $2,057,000, Mr. Lawton would receive $3,334,000 and Mr. Tepedino would receive $2,970,000.

Profit Participation Bonus Plans

Office Profit Participation Bonus Plans

The purpose of the Office Profit Participation Bonus Plans is to attract, retain and provide incentives to employees, and to promote the financial success, of HFF LP and HFF Securities, respectively. Messrs. Gibson, Thorton,Thornton, Lawton and de ZárragaTepedino are currently eligible in their roles as transaction professionalscapital markets advisors to participate in HFF LP’s Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan.

Applicability of Plan to Designated Offices.    Offices.    An Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan applies to each separate office (each, an “Office”) or line of business (each, a “Business Line”) of HFF LP and HFF Securities designated by the Managing Member of HFF LP (the “Managing Member”). The Managing Member is elected by certain senior officers of HFF LP pursuant to the HFF LP partnership agreement. Effective April 1, 2014, Joe B. Thornton, Jr. is the Managing Member. John H. Pelusi, Jr. wasserved as the Managing Member during fiscal year 2013 and during fiscal year 2014 through March 31,2017. Mr. Thornton began in that role in 2014.

Bonus Pool Calculation.    Calculation.    With respect to each Office or Business Line to which an Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan applies and for each calendar year, if a 14.5% or greater Profit Margin is generated by such Office or Business Line, then an amount equal to 15% of the Adjusted Operating Income generated by such Office or Business Line will comprise the bonus pool. For purposes of each Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan, “Profit Margin” means the Net Operating Income of such Office or Business Line as a percentage of the revenue of such Office or Business Line, all as determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), “Net Operating Income” means net operating income (using the same revenue and cost accounts as used in preparing the Company’s audited financial statements) of such Office or Business Line, which includes allocations for overhead expenses and servicing expenses, if applicable, plus any gain on

sale of mortgage servicing rights and securitization compensation from the securitization of any Freddie Mac loans which the Company services, and “Adjusted Operating Income” means the Net Operating Income of such Office or Business Line adjusted for depreciation and amortization.

Allocation of Bonus Pool.    Pool.    Each full-time or part-time employee of HFF LP and HFF Securities is eligible to receive a bonus payment under the applicable Office Profit Participation Bonus Plans (an “Office Profit Participation Bonus”) with respect to services performed during the calendar year. TheIn 2017, the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer, Mark D. Gibson, current President, Joe B. Thornton, Jr., former Chief Executive Officer, John H. Pelusi, Jr., current Executive Managing Directors H. Scott Galloway,Michael J. Tepedino, Matthew D. Lawton, Gerard T. Sansosti and Manuel A. de Zárraga, as well as the Company’s director emeritus John P. Fowler, are transaction professionalscapital markets advisors of HFF LP and eligible for Office Profit Participation Bonuses.

For each calendar year, the head of each Office or Business Line of HFF LP and HFF Securities, after consultation with the Managing Member, will select the recipients of Office Profit Participation Bonuses and determine the allocation of the bonus pool among the eligible recipients.

Payment of Profit Participation.    Participation.    Subject to any applicable federal, state, local or other withholding taxes, Office Profit Participation Bonuses are paid in accordance with each Office’s or Business Line’s allocation plan as soon as reasonably practicable following the closing of the books and records of the Company in accordance with GAAP in respect of the applicable year in which the Office Profit Participation Bonus is earned, or, if determined by the Managing Member with respect to any Office or Business Line, on or before March 15 of the year following the year with respect to which the Office Profit Participation Bonus was earned. In addition, the Board of Directors, or any appropriate committee thereof, may elect to pay up to one-thirdone-half of the Office Profit Participation Bonuses payable under the Office Profit Participation Bonus Plans in the form of equity-based awards pursuant to the 20062016 Plan (or any other compensation plan adopted by the Company under which equity securities of the Company are authorized). The Compensation Committee determined that its practice, starting with the 2015 awards and subject to the Compensation Committee’s future consideration and approval at the time of each grant, is that, upon grant to an eligible recipient, such recipient is to receive 50% of the award in cash, payable immediately, and 50% of the award in equity, the latter to be vested over the course of three years,vesting one third of the awardin each year beginning on the first anniversary of each grant.

Administration.    Administration.    The Office Profit Participation Bonus Plans are administered by the Managing Member; provided that any Office Profit Participation Bonuses to be paid to any executive officers of the Company must be approved in advance by the Board of Directors of the Company or any appropriate committee thereof. Except as otherwise provided, any action of the Managing Member in administering the Office Profit Participation Bonus Plans shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons. Subject to the provisions of the Office Profit Participation Bonus Plans, the Managing Member has the authority to:

HFF LP and HFF Securities, respectively, shall indemnify and hold harmless the Managing Member, each of his or her affiliates and/or agents and the chief financial officerChief Financial Officer of the Company (or his or her designee) from and against any and all liabilities, costs and expenses incurred by such persons as a result of any act or omission to act in connection with the performance of the Managing Member’s or the chief financial officerChief Financial Officer of the Company’s duties, responsibilities and obligations under the applicable Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan, to the maximum extent permitted by law, other than such liabilities, costs and expenses as may result from the gross negligence, bad faith, willful misconduct or criminal acts of an indemnified person.

Amendment or Termination of Plans.    Plans.    Each Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan may only be amended or terminated through a writing executed by each limited partner and general partner of the HFF LP and HFF Securities, as the case may be.

Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan

In general.    General.    In January 2011, the Company adopted the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan, under which members of the Executive and Leadership Committees (or any similar committees established in the future) established by the Company, the Operating Partnerships or any other affiliate of the Company, which include each of Messrs. Gibson, Thornton, Pelusi, Galloway,our CEO, CFO, President, COO, Mr. Lawton Sansosti, de Zárraga and Conley and Ms. Goodson,Mr. Tepedino are eligible for an annual bonus. The purpose of the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan is to encourage and reward firm-wide collaboration and broad stewardship and to promote the financial success of the Company and the Operating Partnerships as well as succession planning for the future. For each calendar year, if the Company achieves a 17.5% or greater Adjusted Operating Income Margin, a bonus pool is funded by a percentage of the Company’s Adjusted Operating Income beyond predefined Adjusted Operating Income Margin thresholds. The bonus pool is equal to the sum of:

For purposes of the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan, “Adjusted Operating Income” means the Company’s net operating income adjusted for interest income and expense and other income (including, without limitation, that relating to the sale of servicing rights, securitization profits under the Company’s Freddie Mac Program Plus Seller Servicer line of business and trading profits under the Company’s arrangements regarding Federal National Mortgage Association loans), all as determined in accordance with GAAP. For purposes of the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan, “Adjusted Operating Income Margin” means Adjusted Operating Income as a percentage of the Company’s revenue, all as determined in accordance with GAAP.

Allocation of Bonus Pool.    Pool.    Members of the Executive and Leadership Committees (or any similar committees established in the future) established by the Company, the Operating Partnerships or any other affiliate of the Company are eligible to participate in and receive a bonus payment under the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan (a “Firm Profit Participation Bonus”) with respect to services performed during the calendar year. TheIn 2017, the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer, Mark D. Gibson, current President, Joe B. Thornton, Jr., former Chief Executive Officer, John H. Pelusi, Jr. and current Executive Managing Directors H. Scott Galloway,Michael J. Tepedino, Matthew D. Lawton, Gerard T. Sansosti and Manuel

A. de Zárraga areserved as members of the Executive Committee and arewere eligible for Firm Profit Participation Bonuses. The Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Gregory R. Conley, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, Nancy O. Goodson, former Chief Executive Officer, John H. Pelusi, Jr. as well as the Company’s director emeritus, John P. Fowler, aread hoc members of the Executive Committee and are also eligible for such bonuses.

Payment of Profit Participation.    Participation.    Subject to any applicable federal, state, local or other withholding taxes, Firm Profit Participation Bonuses will be paid within 30 days of the date on which the bonus pool is calculated by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer or his or her designee. The Board of Directors of the Company, or an appropriate committee thereof, may elect to pay up totwo-thirds of the Firm Profit Participation Bonuses payable under the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan in the form of equity-based awards pursuant to the 20062016 Plan (or any other compensation plan adopted by the Company under which equity securities of the Company are authorized). The Compensation Committee determined that its practice, starting with the 2015 awards and subject to the Compensation Committee’s future consideration and approval at the time of each grant, is that, upon grant to an eligible recipient, such recipient is to receive 50% of the award in cash, payable immediately, and 50% of the award in equity, the latter to be vested over the course of three years, one thirdone-third of the award vesting each year beginning on the first anniversary of each grant.

Administration.    Administration.    The Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan is administered by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, provided that any Firm Profit Participation Bonuses to be paid to any executive officers of the Company must be approved in advance by the Board of Directors of the Company or an appropriate committee thereof. Any action of the Chief Executive Officer in administering the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan is final, conclusive and binding on all persons. Subject to the provisions of the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan, the Chief Executive Officer has the authority to:

The Company will indemnify and hold harmless the Chief Executive Officer, each of its directors, officers, employees, affiliates and/or agents and the Chief Financial Officer (or his or her designee) from any liabilities, costs and expenses incurred by such persons as a result of any act or omission to act in connection with the performance of the Chief Executive Officer’s or Chief Financial Officer’s duties under the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan, to the maximum extent permitted by law, other than such liabilities, costs and expenses as may result from the gross negligence, bad faith, willful misconduct or criminal acts of such persons.

Amendment or Termination of Plan.    Plan.    The Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan may only be amended or terminated through a writing executed by the Company’s Board of Directors or any appropriate committee thereof.

The foregoing description of the Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan and the Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan is only a summary, does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the

HFF LP Profit Participation Bonus Plan, the HFF Securities Profit Participation Bonus Plan and the HFF, Inc. Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan. Copies of the HFF LP Profit Participation Bonus Plan, the HFF Securities Profit Participation Bonus Plan and the HFF, Inc. Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan are filed as Exhibits 10.9, 10.10, 10.11 and 10.1110.12 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.

GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS

Stock and cash awards were granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142017 to Gregory R. Conley, Manuel A. de Zárraga, John H. Pelusi, Jr. and Matthew D. Lawtonour NEOs pursuant to our 2006 Omnibus Incentive Compensationthe 2016 Plan. As noted in the footnotes to the “Summary Compensation Table,”Table” and the related tables, portions of Messrs. Conley, de ZárragaGibson’s, Conley’s, Thornton’s, Lawton’s and Pelusi’s 2014Tepedino’s 2017 profit participation bonuses and executive bonuses were paid in restricted sharesRSUs of Class A common stock of the Company. Such restricted sharesRSUs were granted in February 20152018 and the related compensation costs are recognized, for financial reporting purposes, by the Company in 2014.2017. Based on an accounting policy election, the expense associated with the stock component of Messrs. Conley, de ZárragaGibson’s, Conley’s, Thornton’s, Lawton’s and Pelusi’sTepedino’s awards was recognized before the grant date of the award, due to the fact that the terms of the profit participation plans and Executive Bonus Plan, as the case may be, have been approved by the Company’s boardBoard of directorsDirectors, Messrs. Gibson, Conley, Thornton, Lawton and Messrs. Conley, de Zárraga and PelusiTepedino understood the requirements to earn the awards.awards, the number of RSUs is not determined before the grant date and, finally, if the performance metrics are not met during the performance year, the award is not earned and therefore forfeited. Following the award in February 2015,2018, the stock component expense was reclassified as stock compensation costs within personnel expenses, which will be reflected in the Company’s 20152018 financial reports.

The following table sets forth certain information about awards granted to Messrs. Gibson, Conley, Thornton, Lawton and Tepedino during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 under the Company’s Office Profit Participation Bonus Plan, Firm Profit Participation Bonus Plan and Executive Bonus Plan for performance during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. The Company did not grant any stock options to NEOs in 2017.